[Radix] Fwd: Please Dont Superdome Haiti
Marla Petal
mpetal at imagins.com
Tue Jan 19 10:29:01 PST 2010
> From: "Christian Stalberg" <cstalber at mitigation.com>
> Date: January 19, 2010 5:03:00 PM GMT+01:00
> To: Disasters Grads <disaster_grads at lists.Colorado.EDU>
> Subject: Please Dont Superdome Haiti
> Reply-To: cstalber at mitigation.com
>
> Published on Monday, January 18, 2010 by RaceWire.org
> Please Don’t Superdome Haiti
>
> by Michelle Chen
>
> For those who know how race and media intersect in times of crisis,
> the earthquake in Haiti has probably sent a bump through your pop-
> cultural seismograph. Now it's becoming a flashpoint.
>
> Following an initial wave of sympathy, the corporate media has
> turned an alarmed eye to the increasingly desperate masses. We see
> unruly mobs, bodies piled in the streets (we hear of corpses being
> used as human "barricades"). The insinuations and direct reporting
> of violence flirt with the popular imagination and evoke memories of
> America's most spectacular prime-time tragedy-Katrina.
>
> The AP reports that the U.S. may consider stepping up its "security
> role," while its humanitarian effort continues to hobble amid
> transportation delays, logistical chaos and dubious political
> machinations. Announcing plans to expand the U.S. ground deployment,
> Adm. Mike Mullen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Friday, "The
> initial intent is to strategically place some of our soldiers so
> that they can help with that relief distribution. And then,
> obviously, we're all focused on the security piece as well,"
>
> (That "security piece" has been a pretty huge chunk of America's
> entanglement with Haiti throughout the 20th century, punctuated by
> military interventions and occupation. Six years after the last U.S.-
> backed coup, maybe the Pentagon has a hankering for another extended
> stay.) In the eyes of Defense Secretary Robert Gates, delivering
> help to people requires exerting control:
>
>
> Gates said the primary goal was to distribute aid as quickly as
> possible "so that people don't, in their desperation, turn to
> violence." He suggested the U.S. was aware of perceptions of its
> profile in the ravaged country.
> "I think that if we, particularly given the role that we will have
> in delivering food and water and medical help to people, my guess is
> the reaction will be one of relief at seeing Americans providing
> this kind of help," Gates told reporters.
>
> Military officials said they were trying to stave off banditry and
> lawlessness by rushing relief supplies including desperately needed
> water where it will be most effective, and also where it can be
> distributed in ways least likely to cause rioting or looting.
>
> Gates said early airdrops of aid were ruled out because they might
> have done more harm than good.
>
> "It seems to me that without having any structure on the ground in
> terms of distribution, that an airdrop is simply going to lead to
> riots as people try and go after that stuff," he said.
>
> "It seems to me that's a formula for contributing to chaos rather
> than preventing it."
>
> As the White House wrings its hands over how to keep a tight grip on
> its aid mission, AirAmerica's Jack Rice wonders about the role of
> the media in shaping, and dehumanizing, public perceptions of the
> tragedy:
>
>
> Why is it that we don't hesitate to show a photo of dead bodies if
> it takes place in Africa, Asia or Latin America? Would we be willing
> to do the same thing if this happened in Boston, Los Angeles,
> Minneapolis? Would we be willing to do it if it were dead American
> soldiers piled up in Afghanistan? My guess is no!
>
>
> Shades of Katrina emanate from the descriptions of "anarchy"
> engulfing the streets. Remember the Superdome, the "looting," the
> alleged explosion of mayhem? The media conjured images of death and
> destruction with voyueristic zeal, while curating the stories to fit
> a prevailing narrative of savagery and social breakdown.
>
> Sharp criticism eventually emerged, too late, to debunk the initial
> portrayals of lawlessness as distortions, colored by latent
> anxieties about how black people might act in the absence of white
> domination. But for those initial days after the hurricane, a media
> feeding frenzy projected white middle-class America's fears onto a
> forsaken city, constructed as pathetic and threatening at once.
>
> Jaqueline Bacon wrote in the media criticism magazine Extra! in 2005:
>
>
> For some members of the media, the victims of the hurricane were
> seemingly foreign-or perhaps not quite human. Allen Breed's New
> Orleans report for the Cincinnati Post (9/3/05) described "naked
> babies wail[ing] for food as men get drunk on stolen liquor" and a
> crowd whose "almost feral intensity" prevented delivery of water to
> victims by helicopter. (Breed did include a quote from a man who
> indicated that the decision to airdrop food was "insulting,
> demeaning.")
> The New York Daily News (9/2/05) proclaimed officials "must do
> whatever it takes to curb the hardcore, armed, violent felons who
> are making it impossible to save the city," who are "a very
> different breed from desperate citizens who are trying to get food
> and water." Given that this "different breed" was largely a figment
> of media imaginations-later investigations showed that there was no
> more violence in New Orleans after Katrina than in any typical week
> (Seattle Times, 9/26/05; see page 9)-this kind of editorializing
> suggested that it is, in fact, the regular residents of the city who
> are inherently "other"-foreign, primitive and dangerous. As the
> Daily News put it: "Anarchy, Mogadishu-style, is just around the
> corner if they're not stopped."
>
> Other pundits dehumanized the inner-city victims of the hurricane.
> Writing in the National Review Online blog the Corner (8/29/05),
> Jonah Goldberg advised those in the Superdome (which he described as
> a "Mad Max/Thunderdome/Waterworld/Lord of the Flies horror show") on
> how to survive: "Hoard weapons, grow gills and learn to communicate
> with serpents," "find the biggest guy you can and when he's not
> expecting it beat him senseless," and "protect any female who agrees
> to participate without question in your plans to repopulate the
> Earth with a race of gilled supermen."
>
> In the wake of the storm, author Tim Wise reflected on the barrage
> of since-discredited tales of violence, rape and gunfire:
>
>
> the media, feeling no need to find witnesses or to verify claims of
> black deviance (because, after all, what's not to believe?) simply
> went along. The result? Rescue efforts were delayed because rescue
> workers had been scared for their lives by a press that led them to
> think New Orleans was a war zone; the Governor and Mayor actually
> told law enforcement to stop saving lives and start arresting and
> shooting lawbreakers on sight; and the public, which rarely needs
> reasons to think the worst of poor black people, found its
> stereotypes confirmed. Not only whites, it should be pointed out,
> but black folks too, like Mayor Nagin and his crony police chief
> Eddie Compass, both of whom apparently think so little of their own
> people that they too assumed the stories were true, in spite of no
> evidence, and repeated the charges on national TV.
>
>
> The recent rants of Rush Limbaugh and Pat Robertson (whose vile
> bloviating featured prominently in the Katrina coverage as well) may
> seem patently idiotic. But could such viewpoints seep into policy
> decisions?
>
> Bill Quigley of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a longtime
> advocate for Haiti and Katrina survivor, has some tips for the
> Pentagon on how to "prevent chaos" as U.S. boots hit the streets of
> Port-au-Prince:
>
>
> Do not allow US military in Haiti to point their guns at Haitians.
> Hungry Haitians are not the enemy. Decisions have already been made
> which will militarize the humanitarian relief--but do not allow the
> victims to be cast as criminals. Do not demonize the people.
>
>
> The government's reluctance to airdrop supplies may be grounded in a
> valid security concerns. But you've got to wonder: are the hints of
> a potential sustained military presence a rebranded attempt to
> "stabilize" Haiti once again through occupation? Could a too-
> hesitant emergency response hurt the long-term recovery effort by
> breeding anger and resentment against foreign forces (which could
> possibly, as Jack Beatty suggested on NPR's "On Point" on Friday,
> create a self-fulfilling prophecy of disorder, to be "fixed" by
> outsiders)?
>
> As with Katrina, the 24-hour news cycle's response to the earthquake
> seems a few steps ahead of the gridlocked aid effort, and it's yet
> unclear whether Washington's tactical decisions will turn out to be
> prudent and effective. And certainly, the press, despite its
> capacity for rapid-fire news dispatches, is constrained in its
> ability to assess the ongoing emergency response. But as long as the
> world's eyes are all on Haiti right now--and as long as the memories
> of Katrina's media exploitation still linger--it behooves us as
> media consumers and members of the international community to take a
> step back and separate the grim reality out there, from the
> racialized spectacle lurking within our collective imagination.
>
> © 2010 ColorLines Magazine - The Applied Research Center
> Michelle Chen works and plays in New York City. Besides freelance
> reporting, her various occupations have included ethnographic
> research in Shanghai and coat-checking at a West Village jazz club.
> Her writing has also appeared in In These Times, South China Morning
> Post, Women’s International Perspective, and her old zine, cain.
>
Marla Petal
Email: mpetal at imagins.com
Turkey +90 539 747 7944 Switzerland +41 76 240 8474
USA +1 (408) 806 7888 Efax. +1 (408) 516-5841
Skype: shmarla
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ecie.org/pipermail/radix/attachments/20100119/238c242d/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Radix
mailing list