[Radix] Triangle of Life
David Alexander
david.alexander at unifi.it
Tue Jan 19 08:10:17 PST 2010
Every time there is a major earthquake leading to mass entrapment
Douglas Copp's 'triangle of life' is discussed.
It is true that multiple-storey reinforced concrete buildings that
totally collapse may have up to 15 per cent void space and that is
likely to be found next to substantial solid elements that arrest the
fall of columns, beams and floors. The first problem is that much
depends on the production of dust and small debris, which can fill the
voids. That was the case more or less universally in the 6 April 2009
L'Aquila (Italy) earthquake (308 dead, 1500 injured), in which there
was no indication that the triangle of life had any relevance at all.
Secondly, the size of the void space depends on the whether the
falling elements fragment as they collapse or not. They may. The
result may be crushing of the hapless victim.
But what should a person in a building do during a major earthquake?
There is no hard and fast answer, because it depends on the local
circumstances. Statistically it is better to remain indoors than rush
outside, as facade collapse, and other forms of partial collapse, are
more likely than total collapse, and stairwells may be particularly
susceptible. Anyway, it may be physically impossible to exit the
building.
I think it is more or less impossible to protect oneself against total
collapse, but it would be possible to evolve a simple, robust
methodology to identify the safest part of a building that suffers
partial damage, which occupants could retreat to. That is my strategy
for my own home (I live in a seismic area) and I am trying to codify
it as a simple, useable methodology.
David
******************
David Alexander
CESPRO - Università di Firenze
protezione-civile-italia.blogspot.com
emergency-planning.blogspot.com
www.slideshare.net/dealexander
+39 333 432 8832
More information about the Radix
mailing list